Travel
Sites Visit
Goa, Karnataka,
Kerala, Tamil
Nadu, Andhra Pradesh in
South India, Delhi, Rajasthan,
Uttar Pradesh, Himachal
Pradesh in North India, Assam, Bengal,
Sikkim in East India |
| |
Armstrong
didn't say "one small step for a man" when he set foot on Moon London:
A linguistic analysis has confirmed that Neil Armstrong missed out an "a"
and did not say "one small step for a man" when he set foot on the Moon in 1969.
According to a report by BBC News, the researchers show for the first time that
he intended to say "a man" and that the "a" may have been lost because he was
under pressure. They say that although the phrase was not strictly correct, it
was poetic, and in its rhythm and the symmetry of its delivery, it perfectly captured
the mood of an epic moment in history. In the recording of Neil Armstrong's iconic
phrase, he says, "One small step for man. One giant leap for mankind". However,
"man" and "mankind" mean much the same thing in this context. But, on returning
to Earth, he explained that he thought he had said "one small step for a man".
Explanations offered for the discrepancy are that perhaps transmission static
wiped out the "a" or that Commander Armstrong's Ohio accent meant that his "a's"
were spoken softly. In 2006, an analysis by an Australian entrepreneur added credence
to these explanations, as it found there was a gap for the "a". However, subsequent
analyses disputed this conclusion. To settle the argument, Dr Chris Riley, author
of the new Haynes book Apollo 11, 'An Owner's Manual', and forensic linguist John
Olsson carried out the most detailed analysis yet of Neil Armstrong's speech patterns.
Using archive material of Neil Armstrong speaking, recorded throughout and after
the mission, Riley and Olsson also studied the best recordings of the Apollo 11
mission audio ever released by NASA. They have been taken from the original magnetic
tape recordings made at Johnson Space Center, Houston, which have recently been
re-digitized to make uncompressed, higher-fidelity audio recordings. These are
discernibly clearer than earlier, more heavily compressed recordings used by the
Australian investigation. These clearer recordings indicate that there was not
room for an "a". A voice print spectrograph clearly shows the "r" in "for" and
"m" in "man" running into each other. The researchers said that the Australian
analysis may not have picked up the fact that Armstrong drawled the word "for"
so that it sounded like "ferr" and mistook the softly spoken "r's" for a gap.
"It's perfectly clear that there was absolutely no room for the word 'a'," Olsson
explained. There is also new evidence that Armstrong's inspirational first words
were spoken completely spontaneously, rather than being pre-scripted for him by
NASA or by the White House. -Jun
4, 2009 Go
To Top | |
|